2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between physical and biopsychosocial measures of frailty: Prevalence and associated factors in Brazilian older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with low ADL scores have fewer independent activities and decreased muscle strength, accelerating the occurrence of weakness. The ADL score was significantly and negatively associated with the risk of frailty in older adult patients with hip fracture, which is consistent with the results of foreign studies 24 . The risk of frailty decreases as the ability to perform daily living activities increases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with low ADL scores have fewer independent activities and decreased muscle strength, accelerating the occurrence of weakness. The ADL score was significantly and negatively associated with the risk of frailty in older adult patients with hip fracture, which is consistent with the results of foreign studies 24 . The risk of frailty decreases as the ability to perform daily living activities increases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The ADL score was significantly and negatively associated with the risk of frailty in older adult patients with hip fracture, which is consistent with the results of foreign studies. 24 The risk of frailty decreases as the ability to perform daily living activities increases. Thus, it is important to encourage appropriate activity in older adult patients to prevent frailty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further substantiated by some studies comparing the associations between unidimensional frailty (the phenotype of frailty) and multidimensional frailty (the TFI) with adverse outcomes ( Roppolo et al, 2015 ; Santiago et al, 2018a ). A Brazilian study, including 302 people aged ≥60 years, concluded that these measures identify different groups of frail older people, but both are suitable to be used by healthcare professionals ( Santiago et al, 2018a ). This conclusion is fully supported by an Italian cross-sectional study ( Roppolo et al, 2015 ); however, it was also observed that the AUC of the TFI for disability was higher in comparison with that of the phenotype of frailty (0.83 vs. 0.77).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the study process of frailty, researchers have put forward many theoretical models of frailty based on their ndings and cultural background, leading to different de nitions and measurements of frailty [2]. Currently, two distinct models of frailty are considered for the de nitions of frailty [7]: the one-dimensional predominately physical frailty, such as the Cardiovascular Health Study Phenotype Model [8]; and the multi-dimensional, predominately biopsychosocial frailty, which also integrates psychological and social, besides physical function, such as the integral conceptual model of frailty (ICMF) [9]. Up to now, Chinese researchers and health workers mainly use the one-dimensional concept of frailty [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%