2015 International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment: Towards Sustainable Growth (ICEPE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/epetsg.2015.7510075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between PI & SMC used for decoupled control of PMSG in a variable speed wind energy system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 1: Calculation of reference rotor currents define the error "e " and "e " as follows: ensure the stability of the subsystem according to Lyapunov this, we choose it in the form [35], [36], [37]:…”
Section: Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 1: Calculation of reference rotor currents define the error "e " and "e " as follows: ensure the stability of the subsystem according to Lyapunov this, we choose it in the form [35], [36], [37]:…”
Section: Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 1. The closed-loop system as presented by (17), (24), and (28) can be proved to be stable utilizing a non-negative Lyapunov function ∈ ℝ, written as…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear controller used for comparison in this experiment is a cascaded PI controller, as shown in Figure 2 [9][10][11][12]14,24]. The linear controller shown above has been appropriately tuned for optimal performance with respect to rotational speed control.…”
Section: Linear Controller Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation