2018
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.10744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison between Pulled and Pushed Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation in Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is a pulled-type MCI and the other is a pushed-type MCI. Compared with the pushed-type, the probe guide should be drawn out from the nostril through the inferior meatus in the pulled-type MCI, which potentially may lead to intra-operative bleeding due to the penetration of the mucosa of inferior meatus, and subsequent patients’ discomfort during and after the operation [ 18 ]. On the other hand, the probe guide is placed into a silicone tube in the pushed-type MCI, which may require no manipulation of the nostril and therefore decreases the risk of nasal bleeding during the procedure [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is a pulled-type MCI and the other is a pushed-type MCI. Compared with the pushed-type, the probe guide should be drawn out from the nostril through the inferior meatus in the pulled-type MCI, which potentially may lead to intra-operative bleeding due to the penetration of the mucosa of inferior meatus, and subsequent patients’ discomfort during and after the operation [ 18 ]. On the other hand, the probe guide is placed into a silicone tube in the pushed-type MCI, which may require no manipulation of the nostril and therefore decreases the risk of nasal bleeding during the procedure [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%