2010
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between simulated and experimental basis sets for assessing short‐TE in vivo1H MRS data at 1.5 T

Abstract: A number of algorithms designed to determine metabolite concentrations from in vivo (1)H MRS require a collection of single metabolite spectra, known as a basis set, which can be obtained experimentally or by simulation. It has been assumed that basis sets can be used interchangeably, but no systematic study has investigated the effects of small variations in basis functions on the metabolite values obtained. The aim of this study was to compare the results of simulated with experimental basis sets when used t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each metabolite was simulated with a Lorenzian lineshape with a full width at half maximum of 0.8 Hz. The accuracy of this basis set compared with experimentally derived metabolite spectra has been previously demonstrated (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Each metabolite was simulated with a Lorenzian lineshape with a full width at half maximum of 0.8 Hz. The accuracy of this basis set compared with experimentally derived metabolite spectra has been previously demonstrated (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Metabolite basis sets can be acquired experimentally or simulated from known parameters, [36][37][38] and either approach is effective. 39,40 The addition of known MM and lipid signals to the basis set results in improved analysis, particularly for short-TE data sets or tumor spectral analyses. 41 B 0 inhomogeneity and artifacts originating from rapidly changing gradients, known as eddy currents, broaden and distort the MRS line shape from its ideal form (e.g., Lorentzian for singlet peaks).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time‐domain analysis may also be used to reduce errors from baseline signals by omitting initial data points from the fit, exploiting the rapid temporal decay of baseline distortions (QUEST, TARQUIN). Metabolite basis sets can be acquired experimentally or simulated from known parameters, and either approach is effective . The addition of known MM and lipid signals to the basis set results in improved analysis, particularly for short‐TE data sets or tumor spectral analyses .…”
Section: Standard Mrs Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such evidence includes Montecarlo simulations of normal brain spectra fitted with LCModel [12], comparisons of experimental and simulated basis sets [13], and the finding of a significant correlation between in vivo and in vitro results for both glutamate and glutamine detected in brain tumours [14,15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%