2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0908-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between the Results of Fissurectomy and Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Surgical Management of Chronic Anal Fissure

Abstract: In the surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure not responding to conservative management, LIS may be the better treatment and, perhaps, the preferable surgical technique with fewer total complications (P < 0.005).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations were in accordance with observations of previous studies. 6,[13][14][15][16][17] In this study, pain score in first 24 hours was significantly higher in LAD group as compared to LIS group reason might be due to inter-individual difference in the application of force in anal dilatation, intra-operatively. 4 This difference was negated in subsequent days and difference at the time of discharge was non-significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These observations were in accordance with observations of previous studies. 6,[13][14][15][16][17] In this study, pain score in first 24 hours was significantly higher in LAD group as compared to LIS group reason might be due to inter-individual difference in the application of force in anal dilatation, intra-operatively. 4 This difference was negated in subsequent days and difference at the time of discharge was non-significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It was recognized as effective therapy for CAF for many years and afterwards it was abandoned due to its consequences, such as keyhole deformity that may lead to faecal incontinence [16]. Nevertheless, it has recently been reconsidered for treating CAF both in children and in adults with success [19][20][21]. To improve the results and to reduce the incidence of complications, the fissurectomy has been associated with pharmacological sphincterotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fissure excision without a procedure on the internal sphincter is an old operation and was championed by Ashton in 1854 [25]. It was recognized as effective therapy for CAF for many years, and afterwards it was abandoned due to its consequences such as keyhole deformity that may lead to faecal incontinence [7]; only recently it has been reconsidered for treating CAF in adults [26][27][28]. The fissurectomy has been associated with surgical or pharmacological sphincterotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%