INTRODUCTIONChronic anal fissure (CAF) is a linear tear in the anoderm extending proximally from anal verge to the dentate line. It presents as pain, bleeding during defecation and constipation and is the most commonly encountered problem in proctology.2 Hard stools and internal sphincter hypertonia are some of the main etiological factors. Management ranges from medical to surgical, but medical applications do not achieve satisfactory results while surgical techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages.Two widely performed surgeries include Lord's anal dilatation (LAD) and Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). LAD is one of the ancient and simple surgical techniques, but with high incidence of recurrence and ABSTRACT Background: Surgical techniques for management of chronic anal fissure are Lords anal dilatation (LAD) and Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). The aim of this study is to compare the symptoms, post-operative complications and recurrence risk of the above two techniques. Methods: It was a prospective, randomized controlled trial done in department of General Surgery of a tertiary care hospital from June 2016-May 2017. A total of 100 patients lined up for surgical management of CAF were divided into two groups (50 each). In group A, 50 patients underwent LAD and in group B, 50 underwent LIS. Patients were followed up for 6 months following surgery for pain, bleeding, incontinence, post-operative hospital stay and recurrence. Wong Baker scale, Modified Longo score and Wexner scales were used for assessment of pain, constipation and incontinence respectively. Various post-operative symptoms, complications and recurrence risk were evaluated post operatively at 24 hours, before discharge from the hospital, 1