1999
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1999.4203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison between the Sulfhydryl Reductants Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine and Dithiothreitol for Use in Protein Biochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
306
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
9
306
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a sample with 1 mM TCEP present during AMS modification contained a maximum of only 5 AMS units. This result is consistent with previous reports showing that the efficiency of maleimide labeling is significantly decreased by the presence of reductants (35). If SDS is not included in the modification reaction, only three of seven cysteines are modified regardless of the reductant and conditions used, implying that the other four cysteines are not easily accessible.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, a sample with 1 mM TCEP present during AMS modification contained a maximum of only 5 AMS units. This result is consistent with previous reports showing that the efficiency of maleimide labeling is significantly decreased by the presence of reductants (35). If SDS is not included in the modification reaction, only three of seven cysteines are modified regardless of the reductant and conditions used, implying that the other four cysteines are not easily accessible.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Importantly, CPM is not fluorescent unless conjugated to thiols, a feature that further prevents undesired non-specific noise. In the reducing step, DTT was replaced by TCEP, a reagent that does not interfere with the reaction between maleimide and thiols [30]. Therefore, washing steps in which the samples would be exposed to atmospheric oxygen in the absence of reductants can be omitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When DTT and TCEP were used, their concentrations were Ն1 mM, for which there is on average Ն1 molecule of reducing agent/10 nm 3 of solution. Trialkylphosphines such as TCEP are highly specific for disulfides and reduce S-S more rapidly than does DTT (16). In addition to being water-soluble, TCEP is also highly stable in basic solutions (17), unlike DTT, which readily oxidizes above pH 7.5.…”
Section: Forced Unfolding Of Vcammentioning
confidence: 99%