2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14980-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison between Two Representatives of a Set of Graphs: Median vs. Barycenter Graph

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we consider two existing methods to generate a representative of a given set of graphs, that satisfy the following two conditions. On the one hand, that they are applicable to graphs with any kind of labels in nodes and edges and on the other hand, that they can handle relatively large amount of data. Namely, the approximated algorithms to compute the Median Graph via graph embedding and a new method to compute the Barycenter Graph. Our contribution is to give a new algorithm for the ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is possible to extend the applicability of the k-means algorithm to a wider class of input domains, by suitably redefining the concept of cluster representative. A well-known technique to model a (finite) input set of arbitrarily defined objects is the so-called Minimum Sum Of Distances (MinSOD) representative [3,7,17]. The representative element is selected as the pattern of the modeled set that minimizes the sum of the dissimilarity values.…”
Section: The K-means Algorithm and Related Initialization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to extend the applicability of the k-means algorithm to a wider class of input domains, by suitably redefining the concept of cluster representative. A well-known technique to model a (finite) input set of arbitrarily defined objects is the so-called Minimum Sum Of Distances (MinSOD) representative [3,7,17]. The representative element is selected as the pattern of the modeled set that minimizes the sum of the dissimilarity values.…”
Section: The K-means Algorithm and Related Initialization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Jiang et al simultaneously triggered two directions of research. The first direction focused on devising algorithms for minimizing different formulations of the sample Fréchet function [2,26,27,28,30,31,41,64,67]. The second direction developed prototype-based clustering algorithms partly resulting in novel ways to compute a sample mean [6,8,11,29,39,72].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then M minimizes the right hand side of Equation (3). Since a midpoint of X and Y exists, a minimizer satisfies Equation (2). Thus, M is a midpoint.…”
Section: C3 Proof Of Corollary 36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to understand that these two definitions of representative of a cluster and the sample-to-cluster dissimilarity strictly depend on the domain of the problem. For example, if X=G, where G is a set of graphs, the problem of deriving a representative graph is known as the set median graph computation [1], [5], [6].…”
Section: A Clustering Structured Data By K-meansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element in the cluster that minimizes the Sum Of Distances (SOD) between itself and the other elements is a natural candidate for representing the cluster where more powerful abstraction techniques are not available [4]- [6]. The determination of the SOD-minimizing element can be seen as a meta-algorithm, since it only refers to the definition of a dissimilarity measure between samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%