2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06045-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between ultrasound-guided AIIS injection and radiography in the diagnosis of subspine impingement in patients with FAI

Abstract: Background Subspine impingement (SSI) does not have effective diagnostic criteria, especially in patients who also have femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The classification of anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) morphology via three-dimensional CT is controversial. Purpose To propose a method for ultrasound-guided AIIS injection as a way to diagnose SSI and evaluate the accuracy of radiography methods, including 3-D CT and MRI, as well as intrao… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies have documented a high rate of asymptomatic labral tears in adults, ranging between 69 and 85% [24, 27]. Considering this, diagnostic intra‐articular hip injections are a valuable tool for orthopedic surgeons in delineating intra‐articular versus extra‐articular pain generators [13, 21]. Previous studies have documented high sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic hip injections in predicting intra‐articular pathology at the time of arthroscopy with minimal risk to the patient [5, 7, 20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies have documented a high rate of asymptomatic labral tears in adults, ranging between 69 and 85% [24, 27]. Considering this, diagnostic intra‐articular hip injections are a valuable tool for orthopedic surgeons in delineating intra‐articular versus extra‐articular pain generators [13, 21]. Previous studies have documented high sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic hip injections in predicting intra‐articular pathology at the time of arthroscopy with minimal risk to the patient [5, 7, 20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%