2009
DOI: 10.1080/02699200902916129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between written and spoken narratives in aphasia

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to explore how a personal narrative told by a group of eight persons with aphasia differed between written and spoken language, and to compare this with findings from 10 participants in a reference group. The stories were analysed through holistic assessments made by 60 participants without experience of aphasia and through measurement of lexical and syntactic variables. The findings showed that the participants with aphasia generally received lower ratings than the reference g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, his percentage of neologisms dropped to 2%, indicating improved word-level retrieval within discourse. The lower word count and higher content density in P1's typed responses is consistent with previous comparisons of spoken and written discourse (Behrens, Wengelin, Broberg, & Hartelius, 2009). P2 did not improve on typed discourse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Further, his percentage of neologisms dropped to 2%, indicating improved word-level retrieval within discourse. The lower word count and higher content density in P1's typed responses is consistent with previous comparisons of spoken and written discourse (Behrens, Wengelin, Broberg, & Hartelius, 2009). P2 did not improve on typed discourse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It has also been found that written stories produced by PWA were in fact rated, in some respects, as richer and more comprehensive than their spoken versions of the stories (Behrns et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regardless of the total output or the total number of specific words they produce, most individuals with aphasia use a restricted set of words (e.g., Armstrong, 2001; Behrns, Wengelin, Broberg, & Hartelius, 2009; Crutch & Warrington, 2003; Fergadiotis & Wright, 2011; MacWhinney, Fromm, Holland, Forbes, & Wright, 2010). For example, Fergadiotis and Wright (2011) elicited connected speech from 25 people with mild to moderate anomic or conduction aphasia and from 27 neurologically healthy people, and found that people with aphasia produced a lower ratio of word types to word tokens (adjusted for narrative length, i.e., using the D measure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%