2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of 2 Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques for the Treatment of Pediatric Kidney Stones of Sizes 10-20 mm: Microperc vs Miniperc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the methods were compared in terms of complications, it was reported that micro-PNL caused fewer complications (13.3%) than RIRC (16.6%); however, the difference between these two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.675). When micro-PNL was compared with mini-PNL, another minimally invasive method, it was reported that the success rates were 87.3% and 93.6%, respectively (22). In addition to similar success rates, other advantages of micro-PNL over mini-PNL reported in the same study were that micro-PNL results in smaller decreases in hemoglobin levels and shorter hospital stays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When the methods were compared in terms of complications, it was reported that micro-PNL caused fewer complications (13.3%) than RIRC (16.6%); however, the difference between these two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.675). When micro-PNL was compared with mini-PNL, another minimally invasive method, it was reported that the success rates were 87.3% and 93.6%, respectively (22). In addition to similar success rates, other advantages of micro-PNL over mini-PNL reported in the same study were that micro-PNL results in smaller decreases in hemoglobin levels and shorter hospital stays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the case of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with visual nephroscopy (F4.8 ultramicro channel), intrapelvic pressure is significantly higher than that in the case of a standard channel, which can increase the risk of infection. Research by Karatag et al 19 has demonstrated the relative safety of this approach if the intrapelvic pressure is lower than 30 mmHg. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce intrapelvic pressure, shorten the duration of surgery, and reduce the risk of infection by establishing a standard channel in the case of large renal calculi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yine standart PNL'nin aksine micro-PERC ile yapılan ön-ceki yayınlarda önemli derecede hemoglobin düşüklüğü ve kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı bildirilmemiştir (11,12).Bizim çalışmamızda da micro-PERC yapılan hiçbir hastadakan transfüzyonu gerekmemiştir.Çeşitli önceki raporlarda pediatrikhastalarda micro-PERC ile taştan temizlenme oranları %80 ile %90'lara varan aralıkta bildirilmiştir (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).Çalışmamızın sonucunda stone free oranını önceki literature parallel olarak % 84.3 olarak tespit ettik.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified