2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography to identify structural cartilage defects of the fetlock joint in the horse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of 1 study 40 indicate that identification of cartilage lesions in equine MCPJs by evaluation of images obtained by high-field (1.5-T) MRI or sMRI systems was much less accurate than histologic examination. In another study, 41 the sensitivity and specificity of 3-T MRI for identification of articular cartilage defects in the MCPJ of non-Thoroughbreds were 41% and 93%, respectively, compared with gross anatomic evaluation. Investigators of those studies, 39-42 recognizing the limitations of the use of 1.5-T and sMRI systems for identification of cartilage lesions in the equine MCPJ, did not describe a grading scale for articular cartilage changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of 1 study 40 indicate that identification of cartilage lesions in equine MCPJs by evaluation of images obtained by high-field (1.5-T) MRI or sMRI systems was much less accurate than histologic examination. In another study, 41 the sensitivity and specificity of 3-T MRI for identification of articular cartilage defects in the MCPJ of non-Thoroughbreds were 41% and 93%, respectively, compared with gross anatomic evaluation. Investigators of those studies, 39-42 recognizing the limitations of the use of 1.5-T and sMRI systems for identification of cartilage lesions in the equine MCPJ, did not describe a grading scale for articular cartilage changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[36][37][38] Finally, the lack of physical separation between adjacent cartilage surfaces in both the human tibiotalar joint and equine MCPJ makes it difficult to identify the opposing cartilage surfaces as distinct structures. [38][39][40][41] It is recommended that suspected cartilage lesions in the human tibiotalar joint 38 and equine MCPJ 39-42 be evaluated with a 3-T MRI system because the aforementioned functional and structural characteristics of the cartilage layers and the imaging difficulties they produce make imaging of those joints fundamentally susceptible to volume-averaging artifacts. Results of 1 study 40 indicate that identification of cartilage lesions in equine MCPJs by evaluation of images obtained by high-field (1.5-T) MRI or sMRI systems was much less accurate than histologic examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… FSE, fast spin echo; GRE, gradient echo; FS, fat suppression; DESS, double‐echo steady state; SPACE, sampling perfection with application optimised contrasts using different flip angle evolution; IW, intermediate weighted; SSFT, Steady‐state free precession. References . …”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of CECT has been explored in normal [75,77,[79][80][81][82][83][84] and diseased [39, 77,85,86] synovial structures in the horse, although in vivo CTA studies are currently exclusive to the stifle [39, 85,87]. Despite thick articular cartilage, the firm apposition between cartilage and the meniscus required during CTA positioning complicated identification of mild cartilage defects [39].…”
Section: Morphological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the technical progress in MRI magnets with field strengths of 3 Tesla become available in equine veterinary medicine (Gutierrez-Crespo et al 2013, Hontoir et al 2013). Higher field strengths bring along new possibilities, advantages in image acquisition like higher resolutions, thinner slices or shorter acquisition times in some sequences but also difficulties (Merkle andDale 2006, Chang et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%