A Comparison of a Single-Stimulation Lateral Infraclavicular Plexus Block With a Triple-stimulation Axillary Block

Deleuze, Arnaud; Gentili, Marc; Marret, Emmanuel; Lamonerie, Laurent; Bonnet, Francis

doi:10.1097/00115550-200303000-00003

Cited by 41 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Block effectiveness, onset time, and patients' acceptance were similar [57]. Single-shot infraclavicular block is as effective as a triple-nerve stimulation axillary block and more comfortable for the patient [58]. Koscielniak-Nielsen et al [59] also reported that electrical stimulation was the most unpleasant part of the block when comparing patients given axillary and humeral blocks.…”

Section: Recommendation Dmentioning

confidence: 93%

Patient comfort during regional anesthesia

Harmon

Frizelle

2007

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Recommendation Dmentioning

confidence: 93%

Patient comfort during regional anesthesia

Harmon

Frizelle

2007

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Einige Definitionen waren strenger und konnten womöglich nur von sehr erfahrenen Anästhesisten erwartet werden. So wurde z. T. eine völlige Aufhebung der Berührungsempfindung in allen Nervengebieten des Plexus brachialis innerhalb einer bestimmten Zeitspanne verlangt [6,12,13,16,29]. Einige benutzten ein binäres System, das keine Unterscheidung zwischen partiellem und komplettem Misserfolg traf [34,37].…”

Section: Vergleichbarkeit Der Resultateunclassified

“…In der Literatur werden Erfolgsraten zwischen 87% und 97% in Abhängigkeit vom gewählten Zugang und der verwendeten Technik genannt:F 87-88% bei einem vertikalen Zugang[32], F 89% bei einem lateralen Zugang[23], F 90% bei einer Single-shot-Technik[12], F 91% bei einer Korakoidtechnik[13], F bis zu 97% bei der Modifizierung der Technik nach Raj [6].…”

unclassified

Umfrage zur aktuellen Situation der Regionalan�sthesie im deutschsprachigen Raum

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current practice of regional anaesthesia in German-speaking countries was investigated in a survey. The second part of the trilogy presents data about its use, success rates, and techniques. In 2002 questionnaires were mailed to 750 randomly selected departments of anaesthesia of which 384 hospitals participated. Peripheral regional anaesthesia is used above all in traumatology and orthopaedics, 45% of the hospitals with paediatric surgery never used neuroaxial blocks. The residents achieved mean success rates of 69.7+/-11.8% for supraclavicular plexus block to 85.5+/-9.0% for spinal anaesthesia, the specialists in anaesthesia 79.2+/-11.3% (supraclavicular plexus block) to 91.0+/-6.8% (spinal anaesthesia). Standards for basic techniques, recording of success rates, and for quality assurance of peripheral nerve blocks should be worked out to improve the application of peripheral regional anaesthesia procedures. In neuroaxial anaesthesia satisfying success rates were reached in German-speaking countries. In paediatric anaesthesia its use still has many opponents.

show abstract

“…This indicates that dual injection of the local anesthetic also shortens the onset time of motor and sensory block after coracoid block. Deleuze et al 21 compared single-hot lateral infraclavicular plexus block with triple-stimulation axillary block and found a similar effectiveness. However, they used 40 mL 0.75% ropivacaine, and their use of that high dose of local anesthetic might have biased their results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%