1988
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(88)90162-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of aberration distribution and cell-cycle progression in cells treated with bleomycin with those exposed to X-rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accord with other studies on the biomonitoring of cytogenic changes we used peripheral blood lymphocytes (Brewen and Genozian 1971;Evans 1982;Rigand et al 1990;Ramesh and Bhargava 1992). For treating the lymphocytes we chose bleomycin, an agent with a well-defined clastogenic effect (Chatterjee and Raman 1988). A further reason to select bleomycin was the idea that its radiomimetic action enables better simulation of the environmental conditions, and particularly the impact of X-irradiation on the cellular genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accord with other studies on the biomonitoring of cytogenic changes we used peripheral blood lymphocytes (Brewen and Genozian 1971;Evans 1982;Rigand et al 1990;Ramesh and Bhargava 1992). For treating the lymphocytes we chose bleomycin, an agent with a well-defined clastogenic effect (Chatterjee and Raman 1988). A further reason to select bleomycin was the idea that its radiomimetic action enables better simulation of the environmental conditions, and particularly the impact of X-irradiation on the cellular genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly the strand breaks produced by APH were the reason for the observed effect . Irradiation with Xrays or UV light is known to delay the cell cycle progression in many cells but Chatterjee & Raman (1988) found that exposure of lymphocytes to BLM did not result in such a delay and suggested that BLM was only causing DNA strand breaks and no other cellular damage . Therefore it is unlikely that the cell cycle delay after irradiation is responsible for improved transformation rates .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1978) and the cellular target for CAs induction by BLM is DNA (Evans, 1977). At equal levels of deletions and rearrangements induced by 40 (ig/ml BLM and 2 Gy X-rays in muntjac lymphocytes the frequency of aberrant metaphases and the delay in cell cycle kinetics are less in BLM-treated cultures than in the irradiated one (Chatterjee and Jacob-Raman, 1988). As outlined in the Introduction, this study was carried out to check the effect of endogenous GSH depletion by BSO on the DNA-damaging ability of BLM in normal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bleomycin (BLM) is a glycopeptide antibiotic, anti-tumour drug that has been shown to produce chromosome aberrations (CAs) comparable with those induced by X-irradiation (Promchainant, 1975;Scott and Zampetti-Bosseler, 1985;Chatterjee and Jacob-Raman, 1988) and it induces CAs at all stages of the cell cycle (Povirk and Austin, 1991). As in the case of indirect action of radiation, BLM is also known to induce DNA breaks through the production of free radicals (Sausville etai, 1976;Lown and Sim, 1977;Takeshita etai, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%