2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of activity, toxicity, and conformation of tritrpticin and two TOAC-labeled analogues. Effects on the mechanism of action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 19 TRP3 was labeled with TOAC at its N-terminal extremity (TOAC 0 -TRP3), and internally, by substituting the proline residue in position five (TOAC5-TRP3) to elucidate its mechanism of action ( Figure 1A ), activity, toxicity, and conformational properties. 20 Both TOAC-labeled peptides presented similar activity against Escherichia coli (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 4.0, 1.3 and 1.9 μmol L −1 for TOAC 0 -TRP3, TOAC5-TRP3, and TRP3, respectively), and Micrococcus luteus (MIC ~4.0 and 1.1 μmol L −1 for TOAC-labeled peptides and TRP3, respectively) compared to non-labeled TRP3. 20 All of the peptides showed low hemolytic activity (<5%) at concentrations 25-fold higher than their MIC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 19 TRP3 was labeled with TOAC at its N-terminal extremity (TOAC 0 -TRP3), and internally, by substituting the proline residue in position five (TOAC5-TRP3) to elucidate its mechanism of action ( Figure 1A ), activity, toxicity, and conformational properties. 20 Both TOAC-labeled peptides presented similar activity against Escherichia coli (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 4.0, 1.3 and 1.9 μmol L −1 for TOAC 0 -TRP3, TOAC5-TRP3, and TRP3, respectively), and Micrococcus luteus (MIC ~4.0 and 1.1 μmol L −1 for TOAC-labeled peptides and TRP3, respectively) compared to non-labeled TRP3. 20 All of the peptides showed low hemolytic activity (<5%) at concentrations 25-fold higher than their MIC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Both TOAC-labeled peptides presented similar activity against Escherichia coli (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 4.0, 1.3 and 1.9 μmol L −1 for TOAC 0 -TRP3, TOAC5-TRP3, and TRP3, respectively), and Micrococcus luteus (MIC ~4.0 and 1.1 μmol L −1 for TOAC-labeled peptides and TRP3, respectively) compared to non-labeled TRP3. 20 All of the peptides showed low hemolytic activity (<5%) at concentrations 25-fold higher than their MIC. In addition, compared to its template TRP3, the labeled N-terminal extremity led to a similar complex structure, but was more effective at membrane permeabilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, SPPS offers a precise modification of AMP primary sequences, to modulate their biological activity against different types of pathogens and evaluate structure–activity relationships. Moreover, the design of AMPs via chemical synthesis can incorporate unusual and nonnatural amino acids to study the backbone conformation, dynamics in the membrane, and solution and orientation of peptides [ 16 , 17 ], via spectroscopy techniques [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Why Are Amps Highlighted In the Development Of New Antibiotics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labelling with the paramagnetic amino acid TOAC ( Figure 24 ) is a new strategy in the studies of conformation, dynamics, orientation, and physicochemical properties of AMPs [ 217 ]. Unexpectedly, labelling with TOAC increases activity against Gram-positive bacteria, as it was shown for Tritrpticin (TRP3; Figure 24 ), an AMP against bacteria and fungi [ 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 ].…”
Section: Unnatural Amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labelling TRP3 with TOAC (TOAC-VRRFPWWWPFLRR (T1) and VRRF-TOAC-WWWPFLRR (T2)) led to the increase in antibacterial activity against M. luteus (MIC T1 (μM) < 0.38; MIC T2 (μM) < 0.39) and E.coli (MIC T1 (μM) = 4; MIC T2 (μM) = 1.3), respect to TRP3 (MIC M.luteus (μM) = 1.1; MIC E.coli (μM) = 1.9) TOAC presented a greater freedom of motion at the N-terminus rather than at the internal position. Analogously to TRP3, both TOAC-labelled peptides, showed prominent cation selectivity [ 217 ].…”
Section: Unnatural Amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%