2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04111-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of adverse pregnancy events between ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes in the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy: A propensity score-matched analysis of a large multi-institutional research network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the time interval between the onset of urinary symptoms and hospital admission for further investigations was higher for patients with urosepsis compared to patients with uncomplicated UTIs. All these are known risk factors for developing UTIs in pregnancy [6,51], and we hypothesize that the longer timeframe until admission to the urology department in the case of patients with urosepsis constitutes an important aggravating factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the time interval between the onset of urinary symptoms and hospital admission for further investigations was higher for patients with urosepsis compared to patients with uncomplicated UTIs. All these are known risk factors for developing UTIs in pregnancy [6,51], and we hypothesize that the longer timeframe until admission to the urology department in the case of patients with urosepsis constitutes an important aggravating factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, ureteral stents placed during pregnancy are often placed under general or regional anesthesia and have up to 16% rate of postprocedural complications such as stent migration, encrustation, intolerance, preterm labor, and early induction 18 . In contrast, nephrostomy tubes can be placed via ultrasound guidance with minimal anesthesia and have recently been shown to confer no increased risk of premature labor or delivery, premature rupture of membranes, or intrauterine infection compared to ureteral stent placement for nephrolithiasis during pregnancy, when placed up to 6 months before delivery 19 . These procedural factors, coupled with more conservative initial management strategies among pregnant women, may also contribute to delays in decompression, even once the diagnosis has been made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ureteric stenting in pregnancy is associated with a lower incidence of urinary tract infection, hospitalization duration, emergency department visits, and frequency of exchange procedures. [40] Ureteric stent insertion can be performed using a retrograde approach via cystoscopy, or an antegrade approach after percutaneous renal puncture, with the location of the stent confirmed using US. Performing this procedure under sedation or local anesthesia in some instances is preferable in the first trimester, because general anesthesia increases the risk of miscarriage.…”
Section: Stentmentioning
confidence: 99%