2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-005-3848-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors

Abstract: The paper gives a snapshot of the state of the art in affine covariant region detectors, and compares their performance on a set of test images under varying imaging conditions. Six types of detectors are included: detectors based on affine normalization around Harris [24,34] The objective of this paper is also to establish a reference test set of images and performance software, so that future detectors can be evaluated in the same framework.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
2,434
0
33

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,679 publications
(2,491 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
24
2,434
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…1. We use an affine invariant Harris-Laplace detector [2]. In the shape normalization step the images are reduced to 20 by 20 neighborhoods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. We use an affine invariant Harris-Laplace detector [2]. In the shape normalization step the images are reduced to 20 by 20 neighborhoods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of a Mondrian composition captured under 11 different illuminants (the images are from the Simon Frasier data set [23]). The second sequence [2], of six images, is an outdoor scene, taken with varying exposure times. This not only provokes an intensity change but also changes the amount of diffuse light captured by the camera (as modelled in Eq.…”
Section: Matching: Free Illumination -Controlled Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A dictionary of visual words called visual vocabulary is created first, and then an image can be described using the words that occur in it. To build a vocabulary of visual words, interest regions in the images are detected with Hessian-affine detector [8], which provides good performance [9] and is widely used in visual word-based studies because of its insensitiveness to affine transformations such as scaling, reflection, rotation, etc. These regions are described in 128-dimension SIFT descriptors and then clustered by a hierarchical k-means algorithm [10], each cluster representing a visual word.…”
Section: B Detecting Reused Visual Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is encouraged to consult [20] and references therein. At one end of the spectrum of work on on feature-based recognition are simple parametric deformations, e.g.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%