2017
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2017.1295046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of alternative c-conjugate dual problems in infinite convex optimization

Abstract: In this work we obtain a Fenchel-Lagrange dual problem for an innite dimensional optimization primal one, via perturbational approach and using a conjugation scheme called c-conjugation instead of classical Fenchel conjugation. This scheme is based on the generalized convex conjugation theory. We analyze some inequalities between the optimal values of Fenchel, Lagrange and Fenchel-Lagrange dual problems and we establish sucient conditions under which they are equal. Examples where such inequalities are strictl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By cl f we denote the lower semicontinuous hull of f , which is the function whose epigraph equals cl(epi f ). A function f is lower semicontinuous, lsc in brief, if for all x ∈ X, f (x) = cl f (x), and e-convex if epi f is e-convex in X × R. Clearly, any lsc convex function is e-convex, but the converse does not hold in general as one can see in [8,Ex. 2.1].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By cl f we denote the lower semicontinuous hull of f , which is the function whose epigraph equals cl(epi f ). A function f is lower semicontinuous, lsc in brief, if for all x ∈ X, f (x) = cl f (x), and e-convex if epi f is e-convex in X × R. Clearly, any lsc convex function is e-convex, but the converse does not hold in general as one can see in [8,Ex. 2.1].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking any point (x, y, Ψ c ′ (x, y)) ∈ epi Ψ c ′ , we have (y, Ψ c ′ (x, y)) ∈ C and, for all λ ≥ 0, (y, Ψ c ′ (x, y)) + λ(0, 1) = (y, Ψ c ′ (x, y) + λ) ∈ C. According to Lemma 2.1, (0, 1) ∈ rec C, and since C is functionally representable by assumption, due to Remark 2.1 we obtain C = epi h with h(x) = inf {a ∈ R : (x, a) ∈ C} . If we show that h = e-conv p, we have, using also (8), the chain epi Ψ((0, ·), (0, ·), ·) c ′ = epi(e-conv p) = epi h = C = e-conv(Pr Y ×R (epi Ψ c ′ )).…”
Section: Converse Duality and Biconjugationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[7] studies sufficient conditions and characterizations for stable strong duality in this generalized framework for Fenchel and Lagrange dualities. In addition, a comparison of the optimal values and solutions of the three alternative dual problems (Fenchel, Lagrange and Fenchel-Lagrange) is achieved in [8]. Finally, in the recent paper [4], converse and total duality as well as new results on subdifferential theory for e-convex functions have been also studied, developed initially in [15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%