1984
DOI: 10.2307/2490701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Alternative Testing Methodologies Used in Capital Market Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
143
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
143
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation results in Collins and Dent (1984) indicate that this method of calculating t-statistics leads to appropriate inferences in experimental designs similar to ours)5…”
Section: Hypotheses and Testssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Simulation results in Collins and Dent (1984) indicate that this method of calculating t-statistics leads to appropriate inferences in experimental designs similar to ours)5…”
Section: Hypotheses and Testssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Although the above test statistic is well specified if the variance of average abnormal returns is estimated correctly, event-time clustering renders the underlying independence assumption for abnormal returns in the cross-section invalid (Collins andDent 1984 andBernard 1987). To address this issue, we also compute the non-parametric rank test proposed by Corrado (1989), which is robust in the presence of non-normality, infrequent trading, and event-induced variance (Campbell and Wesley 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Efficient Market Hypothesis theory suggests that historical prices have no predictive capacity over the future prices. Thus, subsequent price shift should be random (Alexander (1961); Ball and Brown (1968), Fama, (1965); Rosenstein and Wyatt (1990), Chopra et al (1992), Malkiel (1995), Jensen and Benington, (1970), Fama, (1970), DeBondt and Thaler (1985), Kothari and Warner (1997), Elton et al (1993), Collins and Dent (1984), Seppi (1992); MacKinlay (1997), Campbell, Lo, and MacKinlay (1997), Corrado (1989), Jensen and Ruback (1983), Charest (1978) and Jarrell, Brickley and Netter (1988)). The event study methodology is one of the most used tool in economics, accounting and financial research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%