2015
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients

Abstract: Minimally invasive AVR via an anterior right thoracotomy with predominately central cannulation can be performed with morbidity and mortality similar to that of a sternotomy approach. There appear to be advantages to this minimally invasive approach when compared with sternotomy in terms of less intraoperative blood product usage, lower wound infection rates and decreased hospital stays. If mortality and the occurrence of adverse events are taken together, MIAVR may be associated with better outcomes. As minim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conflicting results have been reported in human surgery about the morbidity after ICT and MS . During MS, the mediastinum is dissected, which is a major source of fluid production even when electrosurgery is used for the dissection . The volume of fluid produced from the pleural space significantly reduced over time in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conflicting results have been reported in human surgery about the morbidity after ICT and MS . During MS, the mediastinum is dissected, which is a major source of fluid production even when electrosurgery is used for the dissection . The volume of fluid produced from the pleural space significantly reduced over time in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The surgical approach is selected based on the intended procedure, the need for exploration of the pleural space, and clinician preference . In man, current trends in thoracic surgery aim toward less invasive approaches than MS, such as a recent description of a mini thoracotomy for various surgical procedures . However, conflicting results have been published, with some reports of lower morbidity with ICT vs MS, some finding no significant difference, and others raising concerns over increased surgical complexity with mini thoracotomies …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal invasive AVR has several advantages such as shorter length of stay [1,2,3,5,6,8] shorter duration of ventilation [1,2,6,8], decreased time until return to full activity [2], improved cosmetics [4,8,10], decreased rate of postoperative renal failure [5] and less postoperative pain [8] compared with conventional AVR. A recent meta-analysis found no significant difference between AVR and MAVR for postoperative atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarctions, pneumonia, pneumothorax, sternal/wound infections or mortality rate [3].…”
Section: M-avrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (AVR), M-AVR diminishes postoperative ventilation time, reduces pain, hospital length of stay, time until return to full activity, and decreases use of blood products [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].Although M-AVR has a mortality rate comparable to conventional AVR [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], one of the main obstacles of M-AVR is the increased cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamping time [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several sternum-sparing approaches, such as the anterior thoracotomy, [3,4] lateral thoracotomy [5] and right parasternotomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%