2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of auditor and client initial negotiation positions and tactics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Revelation of the identity of the consultants in the Danish case also appears to be conspicuous in its calculation to influence as in the Commission's use of KPMG's words to refute Police Union arguments attacking the performance measurement system. Similar occurrences can be observed in the outcomes of financial audit discussions between an auditor and auditee when changes are enacted to either or both of the audit report and the financial statements after a series of negotiations between auditor and client (Bame- Aldred and Kida, 2007). In such cases the identity of the auditor is given more prominence than the (invisible) discussions that have taken place out of sight of shareholders.…”
Section: Circulationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Revelation of the identity of the consultants in the Danish case also appears to be conspicuous in its calculation to influence as in the Commission's use of KPMG's words to refute Police Union arguments attacking the performance measurement system. Similar occurrences can be observed in the outcomes of financial audit discussions between an auditor and auditee when changes are enacted to either or both of the audit report and the financial statements after a series of negotiations between auditor and client (Bame- Aldred and Kida, 2007). In such cases the identity of the auditor is given more prominence than the (invisible) discussions that have taken place out of sight of shareholders.…”
Section: Circulationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Hatfield et al (2008) investigate the conditions under which auditors are likely to use a reciprocity approach strategy for the resolution of audit differences and whether both client management negotiations style and client retention risk increase this effect. Bame-Aldred and Kida (2007) identify the negotiation tactics used by both auditors and financial managers.…”
Section: S -Auditingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clients may not necessarily have bad intentions when they seek to influence audits and no such presumption was made when conducting the current study. The choice of examining CFOs' potential influence on audits, rather than other parts of the client–auditor hierarchy outlined in Figure 1, relates to prior research concerning auditor–client interaction where the CFO has been found to hold a key role in negotiations with auditors (see Bame‐Aldred & Kida, 2007: 499). The issues dealt with in such negotiations have typically concerned financial reporting issues, e.g., issues dealt with during the execution of the audit.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%