2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijft.2022.100156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of axial turbine loss models for air, sCO2 and ORC turbines across a range of scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An in-house mean line design tool is used to develop the turbine flow path [24,25]. Within the tool, the steady-state mass, energy, and momentum equations are solved to obtain the blade geometry, velocity triangles, and thermodynamic properties for all turbine stages.…”
Section: Meanline Design Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An in-house mean line design tool is used to develop the turbine flow path [24,25]. Within the tool, the steady-state mass, energy, and momentum equations are solved to obtain the blade geometry, velocity triangles, and thermodynamic properties for all turbine stages.…”
Section: Meanline Design Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermodynamic properties and velocity triangles can be obtained at each boundary for both the stator and rotor, as defined in Figure 1. Following that, the blade geometry can be obtained, including blade heights, annulus area, chord and axial chord length, blade pitch, and throat-to-pitch ratio (o/c), as shown in Figure 2 [24,25]. The mean line design model generates a 1D geometry for each stage, including the inlet/outlet angles, the stagger angle, the chord length, the throat opening, and the trailing edge thickness.…”
Section: Meanline Design Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations