1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100001471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of boars, gilts and castrates for bacon manufacture 3. Consumer reaction, to bacon from boars and castrates and an economic evaluation of a non-castration policy for bacon manufacture

Abstract: . A comparison of boars, gilts and castrates for bacon manufacture 3. Consumer reaction, to bacon from boars and castrates and an economic evaluation of a noncastration policy for bacon manufacture.ABSTRACT Consumer reaction to bacon from boars and castrates, whose production and processing characteristics were known, was determined in 122 households consisting of 238 respondents. On a seven-point scale the mean scores for six organoleptic characteristics were similar for each sort of bacon relative to that us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies demonstrate reactions that are more negative towards bacon from entire males than from gilts (Lundstrom, Malmfors, Fjelkner-Modig, & Szatek, 1982) and from castrates (Cliplef, Grinwich, & Castell, 1984), even though the differences in liking were minor. Other studies have also demonstrated only minor differences in liking between bacon from castrates and from entire males (Gullett, Partlow, Fisher, Halina, & Squires, 1993;Rhodes, 1971;Smith, Ellis, Clark, & Innes, 1983), and in a study with un-smoked bacon, no comments from the consumers on flavour or odour were seen, even though the samples originated from entire males (Moss, 1993). In a study of unprocessed pork bellies from pigs with as much as 6 ppm AND in the back fat and low concentrations of SKA, consumers only reacted towards the boar taint if they smelled the samples during cooking, but not when they smelled and tasted the samples after cooking (Lunde et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Some studies demonstrate reactions that are more negative towards bacon from entire males than from gilts (Lundstrom, Malmfors, Fjelkner-Modig, & Szatek, 1982) and from castrates (Cliplef, Grinwich, & Castell, 1984), even though the differences in liking were minor. Other studies have also demonstrated only minor differences in liking between bacon from castrates and from entire males (Gullett, Partlow, Fisher, Halina, & Squires, 1993;Rhodes, 1971;Smith, Ellis, Clark, & Innes, 1983), and in a study with un-smoked bacon, no comments from the consumers on flavour or odour were seen, even though the samples originated from entire males (Moss, 1993). In a study of unprocessed pork bellies from pigs with as much as 6 ppm AND in the back fat and low concentrations of SKA, consumers only reacted towards the boar taint if they smelled the samples during cooking, but not when they smelled and tasted the samples after cooking (Lunde et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%