2006
DOI: 10.4009/jsdt.39.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of brand-name and generic versions of the anticoagulant, nafamostat mesilate, for hemodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). Although Arishima et al reported on precipitate formation in the circuit of blood flow, 9) Hirashima et al detected precipitates in the infusion tube. In hemodialysis, 10) the infusion rate of NFM (2-5 mL/h) is much slower than blood flow (6 L/h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8). Although Arishima et al reported on precipitate formation in the circuit of blood flow, 9) Hirashima et al detected precipitates in the infusion tube. In hemodialysis, 10) the infusion rate of NFM (2-5 mL/h) is much slower than blood flow (6 L/h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] In contrast to such a variety of uses, the formation of a precipitate during the infusion of NFM into blood, especially during hemodialysis could lead to the interruption of hemodialysis. 9,10) The pharmaceutical formulation of NFM is a lyophilized powder with some added excipients (e.g., mannitol or pH controller). It is generally administered in a 5% glucose solution and not physiological saline, since mesilate of NFM can be exchanged by some anionic salts such as chloride, resulting in the formation of insoluble salts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%