2013
DOI: 10.1080/1045988x.2012.682184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Choral and Individual Responding: A Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Horn provided descriptive information and concluded guidelines for EBP were met, a methodological quality appraisal of included studies was not reported. Haydon et al (2013) conducted a review of the literature comparing choral and individual responding. Findings suggested choral responding resulted in higher levels of active student responding and on-task, appropriate behavior, as well as decreases in students' disruptive and inappropriate behaviors.…”
Section: Opportunities To Respond: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Horn provided descriptive information and concluded guidelines for EBP were met, a methodological quality appraisal of included studies was not reported. Haydon et al (2013) conducted a review of the literature comparing choral and individual responding. Findings suggested choral responding resulted in higher levels of active student responding and on-task, appropriate behavior, as well as decreases in students' disruptive and inappropriate behaviors.…”
Section: Opportunities To Respond: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant limitation of the evidence base given that group instruction is a common teaching format within nonspecial education settings. Choral responding is a specific method of group‐based instruction that has some empirical support (Haydon, Marsicano, & Scott, ; Heward, ). During choral responding, learners respond aloud and in unison with the instructor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research in the field of education supports the use of individualized technology for students with SLD in content area classrooms to: (a) facilitate the acquisition of academic skills (Cullen et al, 2013;Okolo et al, 2011), (b) provide multiple opportunities for practice and learning (Haydon et al, 2013), (c) increase ontask behavior and academic engagement (Haydon et al), and (d) prepare students for work in the 21st century (Izzo, Yurick, Nagaraja, & Novak, 2010) The use of individualized technologies in social studies dates back to 1984 when simulation games were used to teach students about United States expansion and migration (NCSS, 2006;Rose & Ferlund, 1997). Since then, more interactive, engaging technologies have emerged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps if students were given more exposure (i.e., more time) and opportunities to practice their newly learned information, they would have performed better. Literature in the field of special education suggests that students with SLD and other disabilities benefit academically from multiple opportunities to respond and repeated practice (Barbetta et al, 1993;Haydon et al, 2013). Notwithstanding this established practice, two constraints of the current study were that a set curriculum with timeframes had to be followed and a block schedule, where participants attended their history class 2-3 days per week, was established in the school.…”
Section: Percentage Of Correct Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation