2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between frame-based and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the obstacles of frame-based SRS, frameless SRS, in which the head ring is removed and replaced by a thermoplastic mask and a back of the head mold, has seen expanded clinical implementation (Bennion et al, 2016). Here, significant effort is required in order to ensure effective mask immobilization and, in certain cases, even with the mask, large systematic drifts of up to several millimeters from initial setup have been reported (Amelio et al, 2013; Fuss et al, 2004; Murphy, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the obstacles of frame-based SRS, frameless SRS, in which the head ring is removed and replaced by a thermoplastic mask and a back of the head mold, has seen expanded clinical implementation (Bennion et al, 2016). Here, significant effort is required in order to ensure effective mask immobilization and, in certain cases, even with the mask, large systematic drifts of up to several millimeters from initial setup have been reported (Amelio et al, 2013; Fuss et al, 2004; Murphy, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy may increase radiation necrosis. However, in one small series, 13 increased radiation necrosis or local failure was not seen in reality. However, a study comparing framebased with frameless techniques that did not use PTV also revealed no impact on the quality of the clinical outcome after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In 2018, Grimm et al [8] compared the clinical outcomes of FB and MB SRS in patients with brain metastases and found no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival. Bennion et al [9] compared the 2 techniques using local failure and radiation necrosis as variables. They found no significant difference with respect to both variables between the 2 fixation techniques [9].…”
Section: Comparisons To Current Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both procedures are extensively validated and comparisons between the 2 in terms of clinical outcomes are cited in the current literature [8,9]. One advantage of FB SRS, certainly from a neurosurgical perspective, is that the workflow has little variance and has been the mainstay of SRS for over 50 years [6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%