1996
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1996.24.3.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Closed Kinetic Chain and Isokinetic Joint Isolation Exercise in Patients With Patellofemoral Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
51
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, various studies contradict this statement, as the studies of Stiene et al (1996), which show that the exercises of ICKC are more efficient than those of OKC in functional rehabilitation of patients with impaired patellofemoral. Additionally, some authors have suggested that exercises in closed kinetic chain (CKC) are safer than open kinetic chain exercises in (OKC) for subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), as exercises in CKC produce less stress on the patellofemoral joint during the functional range of motion so that PFPS patients better tolerate CKC in the exercises, and consequently produce better functional outcomes after a rehabilitation program (STEINKAMP et al 1993;HUNGERFORD;BARRY, 1979).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, various studies contradict this statement, as the studies of Stiene et al (1996), which show that the exercises of ICKC are more efficient than those of OKC in functional rehabilitation of patients with impaired patellofemoral. Additionally, some authors have suggested that exercises in closed kinetic chain (CKC) are safer than open kinetic chain exercises in (OKC) for subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), as exercises in CKC produce less stress on the patellofemoral joint during the functional range of motion so that PFPS patients better tolerate CKC in the exercises, and consequently produce better functional outcomes after a rehabilitation program (STEINKAMP et al 1993;HUNGERFORD;BARRY, 1979).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Stiene 71 Low-quality CCT Significantly better function (step up test) post intervention in WB exercise compared to NWB exercise group. However, groups also had significantly different baseline measures…”
Section: Study Quality/type Of Study Reported Findingsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[32][33][34] In the present review, of all the physical therapy techniques that have been combined with MT, strengthening has been the most used. All of the studies include some strengthening modality, such as strengthening exercises of the vasti, gluteal, hip external rotators, or quadriceps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%