2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of co-current and counter-current modes for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in two consecutive reactors of oxidative coupling of methane and Fischer–Tropsch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of CO, CO 2 , and H 2 within the autoclave alongside the iron and nickel components of the stainless steel interior wall were thought to benefit the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. The Fischer–Tropsch process generates liquid hydrocarbons through a collection of chemical reactions from a mixture of gases. Initially the main products were amorphous carbon, and conventional CNTs started to emerge at temperatures of about 600 °C. As the temperature was further increased to 700 °C, Y-junction nanotubes with a bamboo-shaped, hexagonal graphite structure became the prevalent product.…”
Section: Various Carbon Products From High Temperature/high Pressure ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of CO, CO 2 , and H 2 within the autoclave alongside the iron and nickel components of the stainless steel interior wall were thought to benefit the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. The Fischer–Tropsch process generates liquid hydrocarbons through a collection of chemical reactions from a mixture of gases. Initially the main products were amorphous carbon, and conventional CNTs started to emerge at temperatures of about 600 °C. As the temperature was further increased to 700 °C, Y-junction nanotubes with a bamboo-shaped, hexagonal graphite structure became the prevalent product.…”
Section: Various Carbon Products From High Temperature/high Pressure ...mentioning
confidence: 99%