2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of combined data assimilation and machine learning methods for offline and online model error correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2021) and Farchi et al. (2021). For the RNN used here, it is straightforward to perform continued online training using low rank matrix updates to update the linear readout operator W out .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(2021) and Farchi et al. (2021). For the RNN used here, it is straightforward to perform continued online training using low rank matrix updates to update the linear readout operator W out .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The typical applications we have in mind are at that ML/DA frontier where part or the whole model needs to be learned. Moreover, following Bocquet et al (2021), we aim to address the difficult objective of learning state and parameters on the fly, that is, online as observations are acquired, using sequential DA techniques such as the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF: Evensen, 2009) as an alternative to the variational methods that are more common for parameter and ML problems (Farchi et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Parameter Estimation and Data-driven Techniques For The Geos...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak‐constraint 4D‐Var can be seen as a specific ML algorithm that learns the model error by estimating the parameters in the forcing vector (Farchi, Bocquet, et al., 2021). However, there are several conceptual differences with the ML approach described in Section 4.…”
Section: Weak‐constraint 4d‐varmentioning
confidence: 99%