2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of compounding processes and wood type for wood fibre—PP composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
121
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
10
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(%) of filler. This result agrees with some literature sources that claim that the presence of maleated PP does not influence stiffness 20,23 . However, in the case of the composite containing 10 wt.…”
Section: Tensile Testssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(%) of filler. This result agrees with some literature sources that claim that the presence of maleated PP does not influence stiffness 20,23 . However, in the case of the composite containing 10 wt.…”
Section: Tensile Testssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Twin-screw extrusion is a high shear process that can help to match a good fibre dispersion. Bledzki et al (2005) observed better mechanical properties by compounding PP and wood in a twin-screw extruder compared to high speed mixer and two-roll mill. Nevertheless, extrusion leads to several fibre breakages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such materials offer significant advantages, which justify their use. Wood flour is obtained from natural resources, it is available in various forms in large quantities, light, cheap, and it can be added to commodity matrices in considerable amounts thus offering economically advantageous solutions [1][2][3][4]. The main drawbacks of such composites are their water sensitivity and relatively poor dimensional stability, changing wood fiber characteristics with origin and the time of the harvest, and poor adhesion to basically all matrix polymers [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%