2016
DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201600130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Continuum and Kinetic Simulations of Moderate pd Microplasmas Integrated With High Secondary Yield Cathodes

Abstract: The computational techniques commonly used for low‐temperature plasma simulations are compared in the context of modeling microplasmas driven by cathodes with high secondary electron emission coefficient. Simulations of 100 µm argon microplasmas operating at pressures of 100 Torr and secondary electron emission coefficient of 0.1 are performed using particle‐in‐cell with Monte Carlo collisions (PIC‐MCC), and fluid model using the full‐momentum equations for both electrons and ions. Results obtained for plasma … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cross sections are the same as those summarized by Vahedi and Surendra [27], and represent the default cross sections used in the XPDP1 [28] code. It was shown [22] that the expressions used in XPDP1 agree closely with the cross section described in the Phelps database [29] and the BSR [30] cross sections (B-Spline R-matrix) based on quantum mechanical calculations. For a detailed comparison of cross sections for electron-argon col lisions in various databases, the reader is referred to the work of Pitchford et al [31].…”
Section: Argon Microplasma Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These cross sections are the same as those summarized by Vahedi and Surendra [27], and represent the default cross sections used in the XPDP1 [28] code. It was shown [22] that the expressions used in XPDP1 agree closely with the cross section described in the Phelps database [29] and the BSR [30] cross sections (B-Spline R-matrix) based on quantum mechanical calculations. For a detailed comparison of cross sections for electron-argon col lisions in various databases, the reader is referred to the work of Pitchford et al [31].…”
Section: Argon Microplasma Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…With the obvious computational advantages of using a continuum model (in comparison with a particle-based method), one of the fundamental questions that remains to be answered is regarding the accuracy of continuum models. While this topic has garnered significant attention in the low-pressure regime (particularly in the context of materials processing) [18], only few researchers [19][20][21][22] have studied this problem in the microplasma regime with the lack of an extensive study. One of the deficiencies of publications comparing continuum and kinetic simulations has been the absence of controlled comparisons where one operating parameter is fixed in both simulation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, it cannot be used in a strong magnetic field or with complex boundary conditions [20]. The PIC/MCC method overcomes the disadvantages of the fluid model [21], and further introduces the effects of different factors such as the temperature [22], pressure [23] and voltage [18] to provide accurate prediction of etching in the initial stage [18,[21][22][23]. However, since the electric and magnetic field distributions on the target change with etching, the plasma discharge state changes gradually, consequently resulting in worse accuracy in the latter discharging stage [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verma and colleagues (University of California Merced) compare fluid modelling, based on the full‐momentum equations, with PIC/MCC simulations for moderate pd microplasmas driven by cathodes with high secondary electron emission coefficients . The authors conclude that significant discrepancies exist between both modelling approaches, and they point out the need to calibrate fluid simulation parameters based on kinetic simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%