ICHMT Third International Symposium on Radiative Transfer 2001
DOI: 10.1615/ichmt.2001.radiationsymp.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Convergence and Error Estimates for the Monte Carlo and Discrete Transfer Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the renormalization group (RNG) model systematically removes scales of motion from the governing equations by expressing their effects in terms of larger-scale motions and a modified viscosity. However, the standard ( k – ε) model uses the small eddies in defining the large eddies scale, which, in turn, reduces the efficiency of this model at high Reynolds numbers (i.e., high superficial gas velocity). , Therefore, the standard ( k – ε) model is restricted to the flow without internal geometrics inside the simulated field. Accordingly, the RNG ( k – ε) model is recommended as long as the current work aims to study the effect of internals at the churn turbulent flow regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the renormalization group (RNG) model systematically removes scales of motion from the governing equations by expressing their effects in terms of larger-scale motions and a modified viscosity. However, the standard ( k – ε) model uses the small eddies in defining the large eddies scale, which, in turn, reduces the efficiency of this model at high Reynolds numbers (i.e., high superficial gas velocity). , Therefore, the standard ( k – ε) model is restricted to the flow without internal geometrics inside the simulated field. Accordingly, the RNG ( k – ε) model is recommended as long as the current work aims to study the effect of internals at the churn turbulent flow regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the model developed here may be extended to simulate mixing and solid–liquid flows in FO as crystallizers . To illustrate such potential applications, we simulated the solid–liquid flow in FO using a two-way coupling discrete particle modeling (DPM) , approach in base case geometry. Inert particles having the density of Paracetamol ( ρ p = 1260 kg/m 3 ), and particles of a constant size of 200 μm were injected from the inlet surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model equations for other turbulence models are given in Table S2 of the Supporting Information. Additional information on these equations can be found in any standard textbook and Ansys Fluent theory guide …”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigators have published comparisons of performance of different monochromatic or gray radiative transfer models using test cases or experimental data (Viskanta and Mengüç 1987;Carvalho and Farias, 1998;Coelho, 2002;Liu et al, 1998;Rivière et al, 1994;Soufiani and Taine, 1997;Liu, 1999;Coelho et al, 1995;Helbig et al, 2001;Versteeg et al, 2001). A comparison of different methods for predicting radiative transfer in 2D rectangular (Viskanta and Mengüç 1987;Carvalho and Farias, 1998;Coelho et al, 1995) and axisymmetric (Viskanta and Mengüç 1987;Carvalho and Farias, 1998) as well as 3D rectangular (Carvalho and Farias, 1998;Versteeg et al, 2001) enclosures has been reported, and the discussions will not be repeated. Suffice it to state that it is difficult to generalize the findings as the results depend on the choice of the radiation property model for the participating medium, the radiation characteristics of the walls and the geometry considered.…”
Section: Comparison Of Rte Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%