2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of critical distance methods for fracture prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the TCD is already used in many situations where similar problems occur, for example to predict fracture from cracks in metals (Taylor 2005), where the crack-tip stresses are affected by plasticity, and in quasi-brittle materials such as concrete and bone (Kasiri 2008), which have zones of microdamage near crack tips. More discussion of the applicability and limitations of the TCD can be found in our previous publications (Wiersma and Taylor 2004;Kasiri et al 2007;Kasiri 2008;Taylor and Kasiri 2008). It was shown here that optimum predictions occurred with a critical distance of L ¼ 90 mm, which was the same in two slightly different NiTi materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, the TCD is already used in many situations where similar problems occur, for example to predict fracture from cracks in metals (Taylor 2005), where the crack-tip stresses are affected by plasticity, and in quasi-brittle materials such as concrete and bone (Kasiri 2008), which have zones of microdamage near crack tips. More discussion of the applicability and limitations of the TCD can be found in our previous publications (Wiersma and Taylor 2004;Kasiri et al 2007;Kasiri 2008;Taylor and Kasiri 2008). It was shown here that optimum predictions occurred with a critical distance of L ¼ 90 mm, which was the same in two slightly different NiTi materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The material properties (bone stiffness and fatigue strength) are typical values taken from the literature; in practice these vary from person to person and from bone to bone. Isotropic elasticity was assumed; this will alter somewhat the local stress distributions around the hole but previous work suggests that it does not have a strong effect on the resulting predictions (Taylor and Kasiri 2008a). Perfect bonding was assumed between the graft material and the bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial element in this approach is the definition of a material-dependant length constant known as the critical distance, L. Roughly speaking, this quantifies the scale at which toughening mechanisms operate, and therefore defines the size of the critical volume, close to the defect, in which fracture processes such as crack initiation and propagation occur. There are various ways in which this can be used to predict failure: a detailed description and comparison of these methods has recently been published (Taylor and Kasiri 2008a). The simplest method, and the one which has been shown to give the most accurate predictions in the case of longterm fatigue failure, is known as the point method (PM).…”
Section: The Theory Of Critical Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one level, the cracks, which Taylor and Kasiri (2008) call 'imaginary cracks', clearly seem to be fictions in the same sense as the crack extension and compression stress in the strip yield model: they are often known not to exist, but are introduced to take the place of other types of flaws, which are governed by more difficult to model mechanisms. If we look at imaginary cracks more closely, however, their fictitiousness becomes less apparent.…”
Section: Real and Imaginary Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%