2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36487-0_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Decision Making Criteria and Optimization Methods for Active Robotic Sensing

Abstract: Abstract. This work presents a comparison of decision making criteria and optimization methods for active sensing in robotics. Active sensing incorporates the following aspects: (i) where to position sensors, and (ii) how to make decisions for next actions, in order to maximize information gain and minimize costs. We concentrate on the second aspect: "Where should the robot move at the next time step?". Pros and cons of the most often used statistical decision making strategies are discussed. Simulation result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mihaylova et al [31] review some criteria for uncertainty minimization in the context of active sensing. They consider a multi-objective setting, linearly trading off expected information extraction with expected costs and utilities.…”
Section: Pomdp Framework For Rewarding Information Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mihaylova et al [31] review some criteria for uncertainty minimization in the context of active sensing. They consider a multi-objective setting, linearly trading off expected information extraction with expected costs and utilities.…”
Section: Pomdp Framework For Rewarding Information Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information gain has been studied in the active sensing framework [31], which can be formalized as acting so as to acquire knowledge about certain state variables.…”
Section: Active Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is based on the multi-objective performance criterion described by Mihaylova et al in [18] and has the following form:…”
Section: Next-best-view Plannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By exploiting recent results in adaptive submodularity [11], [6], we provide theoretical bounds for the worst-case performance of the greedy strategy. Such dynamic state estimation techniques have been proposed in the context of Markov jump linear systems [3], information gathering in robotics [13], [20], active hypothesis testing [16], and active learning [9]. To the best of our knowledge, these ideas have not been applied before in electric power system state estimation and fault diagnosis problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%