2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02712-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of depth of tissue injury caused by different modes of electrosurgical current in a pig colon model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrosurgical instruments generally have two different monopolar application modes, viz., cutting mode and coagulation mode [25,38,39]. Most instruments utilize a constant amplitude sinus rf AC for cutting and attenuated waveform packets for coagulation as it is demonstrated in Figure S4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrosurgical instruments generally have two different monopolar application modes, viz., cutting mode and coagulation mode [25,38,39]. Most instruments utilize a constant amplitude sinus rf AC for cutting and attenuated waveform packets for coagulation as it is demonstrated in Figure S4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesions greater than 10 mm (so-called "laterally spreading tumours") or flat depressed lesions can be safely and effectively resected by EMR, once endoscopic resectability is confirmed by one of the above methods. For EMR, the injection solution lifts the lesion above the surrounding mucosa, permitting safer snaring using a blended [45] or cutting current [46]. Depending on size and site, lesions may be removed en bloc or piecemeal, but where a lesion is removed piecemeal, additional treatment with argon plasma coagulation lowers the rate of recurrence [47].…”
Section: Endoscopic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported 21 , overnight fasting can provide adequate bowel preparation in murine preclinical models. Occasionally, residual gut contents obscured the view using water-assisted colonoscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%