2013 Joint Conference of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Softwa 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iwsm-mensura.2013.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Different Defect Measures to Identify Defect-Prone Components

Abstract: Background) Defect distribution in software systems has been shown to follow the Pareto rule of 20-80. This motivates the prioritization of components with the majority of defects for testing activities. (Research goal) Are there significant variations between defective components and architectural hotspots identified by other defect measures? (Approach) We have performed a study using post-release data of an industrial Smart Grid application with a well-maintained defect tracking system. Using the Pareto prin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…w niezależnej weryfikacji i walidacji oprogramowania (IV&V − Independent Verification and Validation) [Port i in. 2007] lub wykrywaniu komponentów narażonych na defekty [Oyetoyan, Conradi, Cruzes 2013].…”
Section: Dobór Metody Badawczejunclassified
“…w niezależnej weryfikacji i walidacji oprogramowania (IV&V − Independent Verification and Validation) [Port i in. 2007] lub wykrywaniu komponentów narażonych na defekty [Oyetoyan, Conradi, Cruzes 2013].…”
Section: Dobór Metody Badawczejunclassified