2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse

Abstract: The hippocampus plays a critical role in learning and memory and higher cognitive functions, and its dysfunction has been implicated in various neuropathological disorders. Electrophysiological recording undertaken in live brain slices is one of the most powerful tools for investigating hippocampal cellular and network activities. The plane for cutting the slices determines which afferent and/or efferent connections are best preserved, and there are three commonly used slices: hippocampal-entorhinal cortex (HE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although DiI injections were relatively superficial and therefore prone to be affected by slicing, we observed significant innervation of CA1 and dentate gyrus by fibers originating from entorhinal cortex (Supplementary Figure S2). This indicates that entorhinal-hippocampal connectivity in our slice preparations is not affected more than entorhinal-NeoC connectivity, in line with previous results (Xiong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Entorhinal Cortex Drives Synchronous Network Activity In Neosupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although DiI injections were relatively superficial and therefore prone to be affected by slicing, we observed significant innervation of CA1 and dentate gyrus by fibers originating from entorhinal cortex (Supplementary Figure S2). This indicates that entorhinal-hippocampal connectivity in our slice preparations is not affected more than entorhinal-NeoC connectivity, in line with previous results (Xiong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Entorhinal Cortex Drives Synchronous Network Activity In Neosupporting
confidence: 93%
“…hippocampus in vitro (Rafiq et al, 1993;Xiong et al, 2017). In this way, afferents from the entorhinal cortex to the CA3 neurons (Neves et al, 2008) remained functional in acute slices.…”
Section: Transfection Of Hippocampal Neurons With Gcamp6smentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Acute hippocampal slices were prepared from 4-to 8-week-old male mice as described previously (Huang et al, 2015;Weng et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017;Yun et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019) with slight modifications to ensure the connectivity of the hippocampal formation with the entorhinal cortex in vitro according to Xiong et al (2017). Briefly, after anesthesia with isoflurane, the brains were isolated and immersed in pre-carbogenated (95% O 2 /5% CO 2 ) ice-cold slicing salt buffer solution (composition in mM: 92 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 0.5 CaCl 2 •2H 2 O, 10 MgSO 4 , 1.25 NaH 2 PO 4 , 25 glucose, 30 NaHCO 3 , 3 sodium pyruvate, 20 HEPES, titrated to pH 7.4; Pan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Hippocampal Slice Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrapolating these in vitro manipulations to in vivo brain function is especially challenging because severed neuronal processes during sectioning alter connection probability and neuronal reconstruction integrity. For instance, one half of CA1 stratum oriens or stratum pyramidale neurons are partially axotomized in typical electrophysiological preparations, which affects morphological identification (Halasy, Buhl, Lorinczi, Tamas, & Somogyi, 1996; Kogo et al, 2004) and synaptic activity (Gulyas et al, 2010) differentially in longitudinal and transverse slices (Couey et al, 2013; Surmeli et al, 2015; Xiong, Metheny, Johnson, & Cohen, 2017). Homeostatic mechanisms also change synaptic strength after slicing in order to compensate for axonal loss (Dumas et al, 2018; Kirov, Sorra, & Harris, 1999), implying that the time elapsed since slice preparation (which is hardly ever reported in peer-reviewed publications) may be a key determinant of synaptic amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%