1981
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1981.324739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Digital Algorithms Used in Computing the Derivative of Left Ventricular Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a sliding second order polynomial fit (22), derivatives of the pressure and volume changes were calculated and appropriately divided point by point to yield the individual relative wall compliances and transfer functions. All compliance and transfer function data were reported at a "driving" ventricular pressure of 5.5 mm Hg in the preterm and newborn infants to describe diastolic ventricular interaction (23,24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a sliding second order polynomial fit (22), derivatives of the pressure and volume changes were calculated and appropriately divided point by point to yield the individual relative wall compliances and transfer functions. All compliance and transfer function data were reported at a "driving" ventricular pressure of 5.5 mm Hg in the preterm and newborn infants to describe diastolic ventricular interaction (23,24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dP/dt was calculated by computer from LV pressure with a smooth three-point Lagrange derivative, the preferable method for 12-bit digitized data. 24 …”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of volume calculation gives consistent measures of LV volume despite changes in loading conditions and inotropic state (3). Calculated rate of increase of LV pressure over time (dP/dt) was derived from LV pressure by the five-point Lagrangian fit (11). The rate of LV relaxation was analyzed by determining the time constant of the isovolumic fall of LV pressure (tau) from the peak ϪdP/dt to 5 mmHg above LV enddiastolic pressure (EDP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%