2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of dual-lumen balloon and simple microcatheters in the embolization of DAVFs and AVMs using onyx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Navigability of DLBCs is often more difficult compared with the traditional flow guided microcatheters, given the structural requirements inherent to the dual-lumen design. 1315 As described previously, the tortuosity encountered in all of the vessels in this pediatric series would preclude the advance of other standard DLBCs, even if they could physically fit within any of the embolized feeders. However, SMC is novel in that it has a smaller OD (Table 2) that can be navigated easily in small and tortuous distal vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Navigability of DLBCs is often more difficult compared with the traditional flow guided microcatheters, given the structural requirements inherent to the dual-lumen design. 1315 As described previously, the tortuosity encountered in all of the vessels in this pediatric series would preclude the advance of other standard DLBCs, even if they could physically fit within any of the embolized feeders. However, SMC is novel in that it has a smaller OD (Table 2) that can be navigated easily in small and tortuous distal vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…7 Being manufactured with a stiff distal tip, SMCs allow for easy navigability in tortuous and small-caliber arteries without the adjunct use of an intermediate catheter. [13][14][15] A smaller tip allows for better positioning closer to the nidus, thereby increasing safety and efficacy. 1,2 In addition, the ability to advance the catheter into distal small vessels and achieve flow control at the balloon level diminishes the risk of reflux proximally in the parent vessel, where essential branches might emerge from it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, procedural time and radiation exposure may be reduced. 2,7,11,18,21 Moreover, the inflated balloon reduces the risk of proximal reflux of the LEA, which has two significant advantages: First, it allows the interventionalist to inject larger volumes (Table 3), 7 thereby potentially achieving higher rates of complete occlusion. In addition, by preventing reflux, DLBCs decrease the risk of occlusion of non-targeted or functional vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Importantly, balloon inflation prevents reflux during liquid embolic agent (LEA) injection while improving distal penetration, potentially leading to reduced complications, better outcomes, and shorter procedural times. 7,8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,46,9,10,12,13 Similar to the utilization of the DLBM to embolize high-flow AVM, inflation of the balloon can reduce proximal blood flow and facilitate the distribution control of copolymer agents such as Onyx. 7,14,15 In general, detachable coils can be delivered and readily detached using microcatheters with a distal inner diameter of >0.015 in. 16 The inner lumen of the Scepter balloon employed here has a diameter of 0.0165 in, which is similar to the common 0.017-in microcatheter, thereby permitting the use of a standard 0.014-in microwire 2,3 suitable for coil delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%