A comparison of electronic and paper‐based assignment submission and feedback

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study evaluating student perceptions of online assignment submission. 47 students submitted assignments and received feedback via features within the Virtual Learning Environment Blackboard™. The students then completed questionnaires comparing their experience of online submission and feedback with traditional methods.Results indicated that 88% of students reported a time saving and many reported financial benefits using online submission. 93% of students preferred having their feedback available online rather than printed and handed to them. Overall, students preferred online assignment management to postal or physical hand-in. The main disadvantage of electronic submission appeared to be student distrust of the receipt system.The use of online assignment submission and management is recommended for use in Higher Education establishments where students may be remote. It is most suitable for assignments that do not require inclusion of many images. IntroductionThere are many potential benefits associated with online assignment submission and management (OASM). As Weir (2004) noted: 'Network-based electronic submission promises greater convenience and potentially full elimination of physical delivery.' Bridge and Appleyard (2005) have previously described other potential benefits and pitfalls for both staff and students, including time saving and the ease of production of electronic feedback, as well as the need for a reliable back-up system.The virtual learning environment (VLE) Blackboard is currently used across the Sheffield Hallam Radiotherapy and Oncology course to provide essential support to our learning, teaching and assessment. A previous study (Bridge & Appleyard, 2005) compared traditional paperbased assignment submission with the online equivalent offered by the VLE. Unfortunately the assignment submission date coincided with a crash of the VLE, resulting in a

Using a user experience evaluation framework for eModeration

“…Moderation ensures "that the examiners or markers are making similar judgments about the learners' performance" [37:2]. The moderation task involves a process of ensuring that assessors used comparable assessment standards by reviewing a sample of learners' work that has been marked [2,3]. Manual moderation "will normally be paper-based.…”

Streamlining grading toward better feedback

“…Dalgarno et al [6] found that students supported the widespread use of online feedback, with a majority of students preferring to both submit assignments and view feedback online. Similarly, Bridge and Appleyard [4] observed that students found submitting assignments online to be faster and easier, and more than half of students preferred online feedback. Heaney and Daly [8] also report that students found electronic systems to be easy to use, and the introduction of an online feedback mechanism correlated with higher exam scores.…”

“…Heaney and Daly [8] similarly report that course staff preferred leave feedback online, and in particular, staff liked the ability to attach comments inline with source code. Finally, Bridge and Appleyard [4] observe that the turnaround time for online feedback was shorter than that for traditional mechanisms.…”

Radiotherapy educational research: a decade of innovation

“…Despite the limited evidence base, it is fair to say that educational institutions have eagerly embraced the efficiency gains 45 and pedagogical power of digital communication technology. Modern radiotherapy students enjoy access to rich virtual learning environments providing them with immediate access to resources, assessment and feedback mechanisms, mobile learning facilitation and a raft of communication options.…”