A comparison of electronically-delivered and face to face cognitive behavioural therapies in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a widely used treatment for depression. However, limited resource availability poses several barriers to patients seeking access to care, including lengthy wait times and geographical limitations. This has prompted health care services to introduce electronically delivered CBT (eCBT) to facilitate access. Although previous reviews have compared the effects of eCBT to face-to-face CBT, there is an overall lack of adequately powered and up-to-date evidence in the literature to provide a reliable comparison between the two modes of administration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of eCBT compared to face-to-face CBT through a systematic review of the literature. Methods To be eligible for this review, studies needed to be randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical effectiveness of any form of eCBT compared to face-to-face CBT. These encompassed studies evaluating a wide range of outcomes including severity of symptoms, adverse outcomes, clinically relevant outcomes, global functionality, participant satisfaction, quality of life, and affordability. There were no restrictions on participant age or sex. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psych Info, Cochrane CENTRAL and CINAHL databases from inception to February 20th, 2020 using a comprehensive search strategy. All stages of literature screening and data extraction were completed independently in duplicate. Data extraction and risk of bias analyses, including GRADE ratings, were conducted on studies meeting inclusion criteria. Qualitative measures are reported in a narrative summary. We pooled quantitative data in meta-analyses to provide an estimated summary effect. This review adheres to PRISMA reporting guidelines. Findings In total, we included 17 studies in our analyses. Our results demonstrated that eCBT was more effective than face-to-face CBT at reducing depression symptom severity (Standardized mean difference [SMD]: −1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.72, −0.74; GRADE: moderate quality of evidence). There were no significant differences between the two interventions on participant satisfaction (SMD 0.13 95%; CI −0.32, 0.59; GRADE: low quality of evidence). One RCT reported eCBT to be less costly than face-to-face CBT (GRADE: low quality of evidence). Results did not differ when stratified by subgroups such as participant age and study location. Interpretation Although we found eCBT to have moderate evidence of effectiveness in reducing symptoms of depression, high heterogeneity among studies precludes definitive conclusions for all outcomes. With the current reliance and accessibility of technology to increasing number of people worldwide, serious consideration in utilizing technology should be given to maximize accessibility for depression treatments. Our results found eCBT is at least as effective as face to face CBT, thus eCBT should be offered if preferred by p...

<p>Mental Health and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes Among Frontline Health Workers During the Peak of COVID-19 Outbreak in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study</p>

“…In many countries with a high burden of COVID-19, various mental health interventions have been deployed for frontier HCWs, such as online training, telehealth supports, behavioral group therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and mindfulness-based therapy. 50 Recent evidence has shown that electronically delivered CBT was a cost-effective intervention in various settings, 51 and mindfulness-based therapy was also a promising intervention. 52,53 However, in Vietnam, the inadequate mental healthcare system and lack of psychiatry services might be a major barrier for having effective interventions for HCWs.…”

Coping Skills Mobile App to Support the Emotional Well-Being of Young People During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

“…Over the past 20 years, rapidly evolving mobile technology has fostered the development of a range of eHealth interventions, including those designed to improve mental health, such as mental health apps [ 13 ]. Evidence has suggested that eHealth interventions for mental health conditions, such as depressive disorders, can be as effective as face-to-face therapies [ 14 , 15 ]. Acknowledging the effectiveness of eHealth interventions for people of all ages and the relatively good smartphone access in most developed countries, international organizations such as the Lancet Global Mental Health Group have highlighted the role of eHealth interventions in preventing and addressing common mental health issues in adults, young people, and children [ 16 ].…”

The COVID-19 pandemic and eating disorders in children, adolescents, and emerging adults: virtual care recommendations from the Canadian consensus panel during COVID-19 and beyond

“…In the absence of more robust research on the efficacy of virtually delivered ED treatments – particularly in the COVID-19 context – clinicians should use these guidelines and recommendations to inform their clinical decisions regarding what are likely the most effective and implementable treatments. Systematic review and meta-analysis evidence from non-ED research suggest that psychological treatments transfer well to virtual delivery, without the loss of efficacy or patient acceptability [ 12 – 14 ] . Although the research evidence reviewed in this guideline may be perceived as weak on its own, the fact that the effects of virtually-delivered ED care also seem to be comparable to in-person delivery reinforces these conclusions.…”

“…Importantly, evidence indicates that telehealth is a promising alternative for the delivery of outpatient care [ 11 ]. The implementation of evidence-based treatments in mental health practice via video or teleconferencing, such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family therapy, consistently demonstrates a comparable efficacy between online and face-to-face delivery, as well as similar therapeutic alliance and satisfaction between these delivery modes [see reviews for CBT [ 12 – 15 ] and family therapy [ 16 , 17 ]]. The telehealth format, however, can present significant challenges for ED care with respect to developing rapport with individuals with EDs, as well as engaging in an appropriate assessment of medical stability.…”