2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40201-023-00864-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of endosulfan removal by photocatalysis process under UV-A and visible light irradiation: optimization, degradation byproducts and reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, although there are studies with classical chemical processes, there are almost no studies with different catalyzed Fenton reactions. In the present study, MW-and UV-catalyzed Fenton studies were conducted, extending the previous classical chemical methods and Fenton processes, and it has been observed that the long time (1-2 h) [59][60][61], which is one of the most important disadvantages of the Fenton process, can be reduced to 15 min. This is on average a quarter of the time of conventional Fenton studies [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, although there are studies with classical chemical processes, there are almost no studies with different catalyzed Fenton reactions. In the present study, MW-and UV-catalyzed Fenton studies were conducted, extending the previous classical chemical methods and Fenton processes, and it has been observed that the long time (1-2 h) [59][60][61], which is one of the most important disadvantages of the Fenton process, can be reduced to 15 min. This is on average a quarter of the time of conventional Fenton studies [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%