2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of farmed, wild and hybrid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) reared under farming conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
142
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
142
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, size differences between farm and wild juveniles were similar in the hatchery environment as in the wild (Table 2), which contrasts with the above-cited studies. This presumably reflects the fact that the Fanad farm strain used in our study had experienced a different selection trajectory in Ireland up until our experiments were carried out in the 1990 s than the Norwegian farm strains used in the more recent Norwegian studies had (Glover et al, 2009;Skaala et al, 2012;Solberg et al, 2013a,b). The latter had also undergone more generations of targeted artificial (and/or inadvertent domestication) selection than our farm strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, size differences between farm and wild juveniles were similar in the hatchery environment as in the wild (Table 2), which contrasts with the above-cited studies. This presumably reflects the fact that the Fanad farm strain used in our study had experienced a different selection trajectory in Ireland up until our experiments were carried out in the 1990 s than the Norwegian farm strains used in the more recent Norwegian studies had (Glover et al, 2009;Skaala et al, 2012;Solberg et al, 2013a,b). The latter had also undergone more generations of targeted artificial (and/or inadvertent domestication) selection than our farm strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Genetic basis of group and family differences in size-at-age Directional selection in farm strains has resulted in higher intrinsic growth rates of farm salmon, which in a hatchery environment can grow up to three times faster than wild salmon (Glover et al, 2009;Solberg et al, 2013a, b). However, these growth rate differences seem to be less pronounced in wild stream environments and in hatchery conditions simulating a semi-natural environment with restricted food (Solberg et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they out-grow wild salmon under hatchery conditions (Glover et al 2009, Solberg et al 2013a. Wild salmon populations are regarded as potentially adapted to their natal rivers (Garcia de Leaniz et al 2007, Fraser et al 2011, and the survival of farmed salmon offspring in the wild is lower than for native salmon (McGinnity et al 1997, 2003, Fleming et al 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the low genetic differentiation between historical and contemporary samples, as measured by Fst and the large differences in growth between salmon from the River Etneelva and farmed salmon under controlled conditions (Glover et al 2009) strongly suggests that this population has so far experienced little genetic introgression from farmed salmon. In summary, the major threats to anadromous populations in the Hardangerfjord appear to be degradation of the freshwater habitat, increased mortality due to high levels of salmon lice infection derived from fish farms, particularly in anadromous brown trout, and reduced production of wild salmon due to genetic introgression from escapees.…”
Section: Major Population Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%