2021
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.727364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Finite Control Set and Continuous Control Set Model Predictive Control Schemes for Model Parameter Mismatch in Three-Phase APF

Abstract: Model predictive control (MPC) methods are widely used in the power electronic control field, including finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) and continuous control set model predictive control (CCS-MPC). The degree of parameter uncertainty influence on the two methods is the key to evaluate the feasibility of the two methods in power electronic application. This paper proposes a research method to analyze FCS-MPC and CCS-MPC’s influence on the current prediction error of three-phase active pow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of constrained CCS-MPC, the online optimisation is required; therefore, its computing cost is higher in this case as compared to FCS-MPC [107].…”
Section: Computational Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of constrained CCS-MPC, the online optimisation is required; therefore, its computing cost is higher in this case as compared to FCS-MPC [107].…”
Section: Computational Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Unified Power Quality Conditioners (UPQC) to compensate for voltage and current quality problems (Irannezhad et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%