2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of fitness functions for the identification of a piezoelectric hysteretic actuator based on the real-coded genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [120] a genetic based identification algorithm is proposed. The reproduction procedure adopts the roulette wheel selection and the method of crossover and uniform mutation [3,125].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Based Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [120] a genetic based identification algorithm is proposed. The reproduction procedure adopts the roulette wheel selection and the method of crossover and uniform mutation [3,125].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Based Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b shows the displacement vector plot with 30Â magnification; the middle stage is rotated and shifted due to the cross-coupling effect. Consider the cross-coupling effect between the X-and Y-axes, the general dynamic equations of XY PZT stage are described as [43].…”
Section: B Modeling Of the Xy Pzt Stage With Cross-axis Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their experimental data are difficult to verify because the selected fitness function includes a term for differentiating acceleration. The solution proposed by Ha et al [43] is identify the hysteresis model parameters and the PA simultaneously according to three fitness functions; however, feed-forward control was not proposed and discussed. Jang et al [44] discussed a piezoelectric actuator-driven system with asymmetric hysteresis and established a feed-forward controller based on the proposed asymmetric hysteresis model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenological models are formed based on pure mathematical basis. Phenomenological approaches for hysteresis modeling have also been developed extensively [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], such as Preisach operator [2,3], KP hysteron model [4,5], the Bouc-Wen model and the Prandtl-Ishlinskii operator [7][8][9]. Although the models provide a purely mathematical tool for modeling complex hysteresis loops, it does not provide a physical insight into the phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%