1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb03691.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of five of the methods commonly used to measure protein concentrations in fish sera

Abstract: The concentration of protein in the sera of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, brown trout S. trutta and Atlantic salmon S. salar has been measured by six standard techniques viz refractometry, copper sulphate specific gravity, automated and manual biuret, optical density and Lowry et al. phenol reagent and the results compared. Good correlation was obtained in most cases and interconversion formulae are given between each method in the three salmonid species. The concentrations obtained with the refractometer an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tIn another paper by the same authors (Alexander & Ingram, 1980) protein concentrations of approximately 38-39 mg ml-' are reported when estimated by the biuret method, which is the most common in the other studies. Thus the proportion of Ig will be approximately double to that reported in the paper.…”
Section: Cross-reaction With Sera From Other Speciesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…tIn another paper by the same authors (Alexander & Ingram, 1980) protein concentrations of approximately 38-39 mg ml-' are reported when estimated by the biuret method, which is the most common in the other studies. Thus the proportion of Ig will be approximately double to that reported in the paper.…”
Section: Cross-reaction With Sera From Other Speciesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Due to the ease, speed of procedure, and small amount of material required, refractometry has been widely used to determine the total protein concentration in bovines, canines, equines, felines, fish, wild mammals, and birds (De Smet 1978;Alexander and Ingram 1980;George 2001). …”
Section: Amazonicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, this may be due to technical di#erences. However, it may also be due to environmental factors in maintaining the fish as reported by Alexander & Ingram (1980), Laudan et al (1987) and Takemura (1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%