A comparison of foraging‐range sizes, flight distances and foraging habitat preferences in urban and rural House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) populations

Abstract

Lack of food for nestlings is a crucial factor influencing population size and dynamics in birds. It is one of the most cited reasons for recent House Sparrow Passer domesticus population declines in cities and rural settlements. However, a detailed comparative study of habitat use by parents delivering food to offspring in different environments is still missing. To obtain the most detailed information on fine-scale foraging habitat selection, foraging-range size, flight distance and foraging duration in typical Central European urban and rural environments, we conducted systematic observations of colourringed focal individuals feeding their offspring. We found that urban House Sparrows had larger foraging-range sizes and longer foraging distances than rural birds. Additionally, some preferred habitats, such as ruderal and woody vegetation, occurred less frequently in the urban area and consequently increased flight distance to key sources of invertebrate prey. In both environments, the most selected habitatsbin storage areas and poultry holdingsoffered a stable and rich but probably lower quality 'fast food' source. Birds were willing to fly a longer distance to forage at bin storage areas, tall ruderal vegetation and poultry holdings. Our findings imply that natural food sources in the urban environment are scarce and scattered. Due to the improvement of socio-economic status associated with better handling of waste products in both urban and rural environments, sprawl of highly urbanized areas and intensification of farming, important foraging habitats have thus decreased. We highlight the importance of maintaining suitable smalland medium-scale farms in rural areas and suggest improvements in the management of green spaces in all types of human settlements that may support House Sparrow populations.

Winter GPS tagging reveals home ranges during the breeding season for a boreal-nesting migrant songbird, the Golden-crowned Sparrow

“…Based on the output from accumulation curves, we created fixed KDEs for tags with at least 13 points (n = 18), as this was where KDEs tended to stabilize ( S1 Fig ), and we used the reference bandwidth (calculated separately for each unique home range) with the adehabitatHR package in R [ 44 ]. Using 13 points is also similar to previous studies (e.g., house sparrow ( Passer domesticus ) using 20 points [ 45 ] and Swainson’s Warbler, using 15 points [ 11 ]). We calculated 95% KDEs, which we considered to represent the full home range and to include forays outside the core area, and 50% KDEs, which we considered to represent core-use areas.…”

Animal social networks are robust to changing association definitions

“…E.g., great tits form small fission-fusion flocks of loose social groups over the non-breeding season. In contrast, house sparrows form very large nomadic, gregarious flocks with loose group-level social preferences, and aggregate at a feeder (Tóth et al 2009;Havlı ček, Riegert, and Fuchs 2022;Dunning et al 2023). In such gregarious systems, the power of the GMM approach may not be appropriate, because meaningful association is difficult to separate from random aggregation (e.g.…”