2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of four implementations of the log-conformation formulation for viscoelastic fluid flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of this transformation is on its numerical solution since it provides the possibility of using the logconformation technique, introduced by Fattal and Kupferman [22], which has been shown to lead to a significant increase of numerical stability [23][24][25][26][27]. In this technique a simple tensor-logarithmic transformation is performed on the conformation tensor for differential viscoelastic constitutive equations.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of this transformation is on its numerical solution since it provides the possibility of using the logconformation technique, introduced by Fattal and Kupferman [22], which has been shown to lead to a significant increase of numerical stability [23][24][25][26][27]. In this technique a simple tensor-logarithmic transformation is performed on the conformation tensor for differential viscoelastic constitutive equations.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique, originally proposed by Fattal & Kupferman (2004) in the context of computational rheology, introduces a better polynomial interpolation of the stresses when these exhibit an exponential growth, such as near stagnation points, and has been tested in the recent past in a number of viscoelastic flow problems and shown to enable computations at higher Deborah numbers than usual. An additional benefit of the log-conformation formulation is that it preserves positive-definiteness of the conformation tensor (Kwon 2004(Kwon , 2006Hulsen, Fattal & Kupferman 2005;Yoon & Kwon 2005;Coronado et al 2007;Pan & Hao 2007;Afonso et al 2009;Kane, Guénette & Fortin 2009), thus avoiding a kind of Hadamard instability plaguing the numerical simulation once the flow becomes inherently unstable, which invariably leads to quick divergence of iterative numerical procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parallel algorithm described in Section 2 is used to compute the two-dimensional viscoelastic flow past a confined circular cylinder in a channel [1,2,11,17,19,26,30,33,39,58]. For this flow problem, we consider a circular cylinder of radius R positioned symmetrically between two parallel plates separated by a distance 2H.…”
Section: Oldroyd-b Fluid Past a Confined Circular Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronado et al [17] presented a simple alternate form of the log-conformation formulation in which the conformation tensor is replaced by the matrix exponential. Kane et al [30] compared four different implementation of the log-conformation formulation on the flow around a circular cylinder. The authors pointed out that the original log-conformation [22] is an excellent choice despite its complex implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation