2004
DOI: 10.1177/1073191104268199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Four Measures of Self-Control Skills

Abstract: This study compares the psychometric characteristics of four questionnaires designed to assess self-control skills: the Self-Control Questionnaire, the Frequency of Self-Reinforcement Questionnaire, the Cognitive Self-Management Test, and the Lifestyle Approaches Inventory. Content validity was judged to be fairly comparable by three raters in Study 1. In Study 2, convergent and divergent validity support was obtained for all four questionnaires when administered to 369 multiethnic college students, but the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(268 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly for the SCS, we averaged published data from several reports using Kendall and Sheldrick’s (2000) methods to weight studies’ means and SD s by sample sizes to estimate population values. Studies contributing SCS normative data were Ingledew, Hardy, and Cooper (1992); Katz and Singh (1986); Flett, Blankstein, Bator, and Pliner (1989); Goff (2010); MacLachlan (1985); Mezo and Heiby (2004); Redden, Tucker, and Young (1983); Richards (1985); and Rosenbaum (1980; only data from the English-language SCS included), which yielded pooled M = 26.0, SD = 22.3. Mindful of patients’ difficulty in completing the original ASQ (Peterson et al, 1982), Dykema, Bergbower, Doctora, and Peterson (1996) created the short form with better internal consistency and strong validity used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly for the SCS, we averaged published data from several reports using Kendall and Sheldrick’s (2000) methods to weight studies’ means and SD s by sample sizes to estimate population values. Studies contributing SCS normative data were Ingledew, Hardy, and Cooper (1992); Katz and Singh (1986); Flett, Blankstein, Bator, and Pliner (1989); Goff (2010); MacLachlan (1985); Mezo and Heiby (2004); Redden, Tucker, and Young (1983); Richards (1985); and Rosenbaum (1980; only data from the English-language SCS included), which yielded pooled M = 26.0, SD = 22.3. Mindful of patients’ difficulty in completing the original ASQ (Peterson et al, 1982), Dykema, Bergbower, Doctora, and Peterson (1996) created the short form with better internal consistency and strong validity used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional regulation refers to control of sentiments and motives, and cognitive regulation means to control thoughts and actions that are related to planning and execution of behaviors (10). Self-regulation has a significant relationship with general adjustment, emotional states, health-related habits, and athletic performance (11)(12)(13), and self-regulation deficiency is considered a psychological barrier to health-related behaviors such as exercise (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSM is composed of 26 items, with each item rated on a 5‐point scale. No uniform scoring guidelines were provided at the time of instrument development; however, a one to five scale has been used for the individual items, with a corresponding total score ranging from 26 to 130 (Mezo, 2009; Mezo & Heiby, 2004). The CSM was designed to assess cognitive aspects of self‐management and to “tap feelings of efficacy in approaching new tasks, and style of self‐talk (supportive versus disparaging)” (Rude, 1986, p. 391).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instruments have included the Self‐Control Questionnaire (SCQ; Rehm et al., 1981), the Frequency of Self‐Reinforcement Questionnaire (FSRQ; Heiby, 1982), the Cognitive Self‐Management Test (CSM; Rude, 1986), a second Self‐Control Questionnaire (SCQ‐Brandon; Brandon, Oescher, & Loftin, 1990), and the Self‐Control and Self‐Management Scale (SCMS; Mezo, 2009). Although some debate exists regarding the specific assessment targets of some of these instruments (Mezo & Heiby, 2004), they are all associated with Kanfer's (1970) definition of self‐management. All of these instruments have acceptable reliability and validity estimates (Mezo & Heiby, 2004).…”
Section: Proposed Cut‐off Scores For Self‐management Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation