2008
DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of four methods for assessing natural helping ability

Abstract: The current study was designed to compare four possible methods of identifying natural helpers: a self‐report measure of natural helping ability, ratings by others of helping ability based on two 10‐minute helping sessions, self‐report on measures assessing theoretically‐derived constructs related to natural helping, and a self‐report of intent to pursue a helping career. On the basis of a correlational analysis, we found the most support for the self‐report measure of natural helping ability and intent to pur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also believed that they could positively influence their peers and were fairly new to Rotary and hence had the energy to drive health programs, and they believed in the importance of health prevention. However, no measure or study has been developed to identify which specific characteristics or qualities LHAs need in health promotion in community settings to ensure the success of the intervention (Stahl & Hill, 2008).. The research team is currently working on such a project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also believed that they could positively influence their peers and were fairly new to Rotary and hence had the energy to drive health programs, and they believed in the importance of health prevention. However, no measure or study has been developed to identify which specific characteristics or qualities LHAs need in health promotion in community settings to ensure the success of the intervention (Stahl & Hill, 2008).. The research team is currently working on such a project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural helping measure (NHM; Stahl & Hill, ) assesses self‐reported helping inclinations and experiences. The NHM includes five items (e.g., “I often find myself helping others with their problems”) using a 7‐point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 7 (always); the final score is the average of the five items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is clearly some association between self-perception of competence, and actual performance of counselling skills in real-life situations with clients (see e.g. McLeod & Rodgers, 2008;Stahl & Hill, 2008), there is an obvious need to be able to supplement self-report data with findings from studies that use observational data.…”
Section: The Process and Outcome Of Training In Embedded Counselling mentioning
confidence: 97%