2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9834-7_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Gear Mesh Stiffness Modeling Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another way to address the contact analysis is related to FEM simulations; this approach is helpful to determine the gear contact stiffness and the corresponding strain and stress distributions in the teeth. In particular the multibody kinematic approach uses a contact stiffness which depends on parameters that are not yet well understood [6]. In the present work the overload effects due to both speed and meshing in a gear couple of an electric vehicle transmission have been analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to address the contact analysis is related to FEM simulations; this approach is helpful to determine the gear contact stiffness and the corresponding strain and stress distributions in the teeth. In particular the multibody kinematic approach uses a contact stiffness which depends on parameters that are not yet well understood [6]. In the present work the overload effects due to both speed and meshing in a gear couple of an electric vehicle transmission have been analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors [9][10][11][12] utilized different methods of estimating time-varying stiffness in order to get practical dynamic simulation results. Meagher et al [13] presented three different dynamic system modeling strategies currently being used by researchers to identify diagnostic indicators of gear health: a strength of materialsbased lumped parameter model, nonlinear quasistatic finite element modeling, and rigid multibody kinematic modeling with nonlinear contact stiffness. This research contrasts these methods of modeling gear dynamics by comparing their predicted stiffness cycle and its effect on dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other one is a continuous contact where the contact is defined as a nonlinear spring (see Fig. 3) (Meagher, WU and KONG, 2010). Both of them are respectively available in MSC.Adams/View as the Restitution Method which calculates the collision force by a recovery coefficient, and the Impact Method which uses the stiffness and damping coefficients to calculate the contact force.…”
Section: Determination Of the Contact Force Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%